Site Search

Entries in Farmers Mutual (MN) (4)

Wednesday
Mar282012

Time Keeps Ticking Away for Fiber Projects in Minnesota

ILECs and Co-ops Discuss Hurdles to Deploying Stimulus-funded Broadband

In Minnesota alone, the Recovery Act of 2009 funded 18 fiber construction projects, for a total of $229m in grants and loans. But many of those expansion projects have hit snags, either due to bad weather, slow paper work, deadline difficulties, regulatory red tape, or shortages of fiber and other supplies.

This week Minnesota Public Radio ran a story detailing some of the fiber deployment issues in the state, and a variety of companies and projects had one thing in common: the need for deadline extensions, which better reflect current timeline estimates. And the RUS is extending those deadlines. Now all projects funded by the Recovery Act will have until 2015 to be completed. According to MPR News, the RUS found that “some awardees were so concerned about the original deadlines, they considered canceling their deals.” Extensions to 2015 were always possible, the RUS representative said, and now projects won't be rushed.

One Minnesota company experiencing delays is Farmers Mutual Telephone in Bellingham—a local telco that's building out its broadband network to include 1,500 homes in Lac qui Parle County in western Minnesota. The project is being funded by $10m of stimulus funds, but for a while Farmers Mutual had trouble securing fiber optic cable. MPR reported that, “A cable drought has been caused by high demand from a crush of stimulus-induced broadband projects nationwide coupled with a Japanese earthquake a year ago that destroyed a major fiber manufacturing plant.” The cable drought has had a ripple effect nationwide, too. Just last month we heard a similar account from Quitman, Texas-based Peoples Telephone, who was determinedly moving along with its broadband build.

Farmers Mutual finally received the cable it needed last October, but with Minnesota winters, that didn't leave much time for construction. Farmers Mutual general manager Kevin Beyer said that fiber orders from bigger companies were filled first, with smaller companies having to wait months to get the supplies they needed. “The first orders filled should have been ours since we ordered ahead of others,” Beyer said, “but the game got changed a bit. There was a reshuffling of who mattered.”

For the companies and cooperatives who didn't have trouble getting fiber, the cost of fiber optic lines and other supplies were often more expensive, due to demand. Doug Dawson, who owns a broadband project consulting company, said that in some cases, the fiber shortage has driven prices up 15-20%.

Dawson and his company, CCG, have managed the roll out of fiber projects around the world and in nearly every U.S. state. As for his planned project in Minnesota, Dawson wants to deploy fiber in Sibley and Renville Counties in the western part of the state, and he's had to be crafty to secure adequate amounts of fiber. Dawson told MPR: “We'll find the fiber somewhere for Sibley and Renville... but if somebody bigger and richer than us wants it, it's gone.” In other instances, Dawson said he's had to “go to other people who have built and have a half a mile on the shelf. People are getting chummy,” often swapping or trading supplies that are in hard to find.

At Winnebago Telephone Cooperative—based in Lake Milles, Iowa, but with a network that expands into southern Minnesota—the delay involved environmental permits. To get all the necessary paper work completed and permits granted, Terry Wegener said it took his company a few extra months to start construction. “We wanted to start in April,” Wegener said, “but we didn't get to start until August because of the environmental permitting.”

Other fiber projects like those planned by the Arrowhead Electric Cooperative and Lake County, say that staffing issues at the RUS are delaying paper work and permits. “We look at it this way,” said Lake County Commissioner Paul Bergman, “they [the RUS] got 300 approved applications and the great leaders in Congress didn't give them more people. There has been a strain on them but it's not really their fault. It's like a mob scene going into a concert and there is only one security person.”

But there have been some federally-funded networks completed in Minnesota, too. Halstad Telephone has been one of the most talked-about success stories, at times receiving national attention for its quick progress. When the RUS sent out letters to awardees last October, hoping to speed the process of deployment along, the agency only listed six completed projects in the country—and two of them were built by Halstad Telephone. One of the reasons for the small telco's progress was that the company chose not to wait for stimulus dollars and went ahead with its planned network expansion in portions of Norman and Polk Counties, and areas across the border into North Dakota. To date, the North Dakota networks are completed, and the one in Minnesota (which will reach 1k households and farms) is slated to be finished this fall.

Halstad ceo Tim Maroney said the company was fortunate to be selected for RUS funds early, and the company was able to procure fiber before the big rush. “We just jumped on it. We didn't wait for the money to come. We started the engineering and negotiations. We took a chance,” Maroney said.

As for those still waiting to break ground, this year's early spring is nothing short of ironic. “It's unfortunate that out of all the years, when we have all this construction to do, we have this weather. Come on. What horrible luck,” said Joe Buttweiler, Arrowhead Electric's director of broadband projects. “On the flip side, extra time to plan and make sure you're organized is not a bad thing either.”

Sunday
Jan082012

2011 ILEC Deals Few and Far Between: Has the Ship Sailed?

Will a Little Regulatory Certainty Kick-start this Tepid Market in 2012?

Despite fervent deal activity in most telecom sectors in 2011, ILEC deals were incredibly slim. Sixteen deals were announced in 2010, but JSI Capital Advisors only tracked 6 new deals in 2011—plus one more that didn’t quite make it to the finish line. Although there could be a variety of reasons why ILEC deals were so few and far between in 2011, the single most likely culprit is regulatory uncertainty surrounding USF and ICC. The question is: did small ILECs miss the boat on a good deal before USF/ICC took a dark turn, or will there be a revitalization of ILEC deals once the fog clears and companies (hopefully) have a somewhat brighter future?

Of the 6 small ILEC deals in 2011, less than half were RLECs buying other RLECs, one involved an RLEC buying a telecom utility, and two involved investment firms on one side or another:

 

2011 was not the first year for a decrease in ILEC deals, but definitely the first year for such a steep decline- JSI Capital Advisors reported 16 deals in 2010, 18 deals in 2009, 19 in 2008 and 20 in 2007 (The Deal Advisor: ILEC Sales Closing in 2010 Approach $10b). Many of you may remember “The Great Dallas Debate” at the 2011 NTCA annual meeting where National Broadband Plan director and Aspen Institute fellow Blair Levin faced off against RLEC duo Randy Houdek (Venture Communications Cooperative) and Delbert Wilson (Hill County Telephone Cooperative). This debate became notorious for a lot of things, but Levin did make one point that even the most dedicated RLEC advocate would have a hard time denying—the “deal” that the rural industry could have gotten with USF/ICC reform a few years ago would have been relatively better than the deal they got in 2011, and the deal we ended up with in 2011 is probably better than the one we would get in the future. Can the same logic be applied to ILEC mergers and acquisitions?

If so, can we expect less than 6 small ILEC deals in 2012? It may depend on how the USF/ICC changes impact the value of these companies. Even though the sheer fact that USF/ICC reform has technically been achieved (assuming the pending appeals cases don’t change anything significantly), it sure doesn’t seem like there is a whole lot of “regulatory certainty”—at least not the level of certainty that could help increase valuations and make RLECs attractive to buyers as they were back in the day. An industry that was once considered safe, profitable and solid as a rock is starting to look like anything but when you factor in the regression analysis-induced “race to the middle,” reduced access revenue, declining landline connections and myriad competitive forces.

A couple of 2011 deals, like La Motte Telephone purchasing Andrew Telephone (both in Iowa) and Otelco acquiring Vermont-based Shoreham Telephone Company were fairly straightforward examples of convenient deals that would boost the buyer’s footprint and create various operating and strategic synergies. Interestingly the Otelco-Shoreham deal reflects the issue mentioned above—that RLECs have possibly missed the boat on a good deal—as Shoreham was reportedly offered three times more from a prospective buyer in 2003 than what Otelco offered in 2011 (The Deal Advisor: Otelco to Acquire Shoreham Telephone for $4.5m).

Also interesting is that the FCC has made no effort to hide its desires that small RLECs merge—consolidated switching is strongly recommended in the ICC section of the Order. The FCC may not have considered that its very own actions on USF/ICC are prohibiting a vibrant market for high-value small rural telephone company deals, but there are more factors to consider than just regulatory uncertainty. The almost-merger between small Minnesota RLECs Farmers Mutual Telephone Company and Federated Telephone Company illustrates this point quite effectively. It was the members of one of the cooperatives who killed a deal that (on paper at least) appeared to be a perfect match (The Deal Advisor: Farmers Mutual Fails to Approve Merger with Federated Tel.).

Is there any optimism for an upswing in ILEC deals in 2012? If prospective buyers are willing to accept the regulatory risks and if ILECs can figure out how to build value in this environment, then it is certainly possible. But will we look back at the 6 deals of 2011 as an unusually low outlier simply because of the year’s heightened regulatory uncertainty, or are single-digit deals the new norm?

Tuesday
Jan032012

MN Releases BB Report, Co-ops Meet Goals but Behind on Stimulus Builds

Source: Minnesota Governor's Task Force on Broadband

Minnesota released a report on the status of broadband in the state of Minnesota. The report is a high-level analysis utilizing existing data and information for the task force to evaluate. The task force will release a Minnesota Broadband Plan Outline in January 2012.

Among other things included in the report is a map detailing broadband availability and those who have already met the state goal of 10 Mbps download/5 Mbps upload. The report also includes a status report on stimulus project builds. Federated Telephone and Farmers Mutual both report delays caused by fiber shortages as reasons behind construction delays.

Click here for full report.

Sunday
Jun122011

Farmers Mutual Members Reject Merger with Federated Telephone

Source: The Deal Advisor

Cooperative members at Farmers Mutual of Bellingham, Minn. yesterday rejected a proposed merger with neighboring coop Federated Telephone of Chokio, Minn. Unidentified opponents to the combination waged a public campaign against the combination; as a result, just 57.5% of Farmers' members supported the plan--falling short of the needed 66.6% approval.

Richelle Elberg tells the story here.