Site Search

Entries in In Search of Success (51)

Wednesday
Mar142012

Are Telcos Ramping Up for More Involvement in the Cloud?

Networks are Key to the Cloud, Leaders Say, and Should Capitalize on the Its Potential

In recent weeks, several industry leaders have reiterated the potential for telcos to get more involved in the cloud—to finally embrace the movement deemed “Telco 2.0.” At the Cloud Connect Conference in Santa Clara, California, NTT America cto Doug Junkins reminded a standing-room-only crowd that, “The cloud is not the cloud without the network.” That same week, AT&T announced its virtual private cloud service—AT&T Synaptic Compute as a Service—through VMware. And just last week, Warren Chaisatien, Ericsson Strategic Marketing Manager, said, “At a time when telecom operators across the region are looking to differentiate themselves and looking for new revenue streams, cloud services offer growing and largely untapped potential.... Operators are in a unique position to utilize their expertise in managed services and take advantage of network features to enhance cloud offerings for users.”

There has even been a flurry of articles lately, as analysts discuss the specifics of how and where telcos should get involved with the cloud. All of this clamoring comes after several quiet months, where there seemed to be little conversation or activity in the way of telco investments in the cloud. Perhaps a new kind of “spring fever” is upon us.

And it's about time. In 2011 we saw telcos dip into the cloud services game by investing more and more in data centers—from giants like Verizon and TDS, to Kansas-based Twin Valley Telephone, North Carolina-based North State Communications, and New York-based Warwick Valley Telephone. For many companies, the hope was that revenue from data centers would allow them both to capitalize on the cloud hype and offset other losses with a new revenue stream. In some cases that strategy seems to have worked, at least in the short term. Last month Cincinnati Bell, one of the first publicly-traded LECs to invest heavily in data centers, reported that during an otherwise lackluster quarter, revenue from its data center unit had increased 21% in 4Q11, compared with 4Q10. The data center unit was its highest performing growth area.

But Junkins and others at the Cloud Connect Conference think there is more cloud revenue for the taking, beyond just data centers. Specifically, Junkins argued in his break-out session that telcos are already sitting on the golden ticket: the networks they already own. And telcos cannot afford to be, simply, a "dumb pipe." According to analyst David Berlind, Junkins's message was “practically a constant theme” throughout the conference—asserting that carriers are “uniquely positioned to be the preferred providers of an array of cloud-based services to enterprises.” This includes “everything from virtualized networks to public and private infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) offerings.” To Berlind, “It's just a matter of time before the telcos recognize the opportunities, realign their currently siloed businesses, and embrace more of a 'Telco 2.0' culture.”

In fact some analysts argue that, in order for telcos to remain relevant to consumers in a post-PSTN era, “data-centric” services, via the cloud, will have to become a priority. Possibilities include, of course, Enterprise Cloud Services—meaning data storage and processing, which some providers are already doing by owning and operating cloud computing facilities, or by partnering with other third parties. But there are also opportunities to participate in Consumer Cloud Services, which securely store consumer data and digital entertainment services.

For now, it's mostly the big companies like AT&T or Verizon who are making headlines with cloud services, data centers, and the like. But as I've talked with small and regional providers in rural areas recently, most of them admit that they, too, are exploring cloud services. For example, when I spoke to Peoples Telephone Cooperative marketing director Lisa Webber last month, she acknowledged that the Texas co-op was “looking into cloud services” and hoped to get involved in the near future. The same sentiments came from Paul Bunyan Telephone in Minnesota—in just about the same phrasing. Right now, that's usually as far as the discussion goes; rural telcos are interested in the cloud, but the question is, will they get involved in the cloud.

Tuesday
Mar132012

Twin Lakes Telephone Deploys Entone's FusionTV

Source: Entone Press Release

Entone, Inc. announced that Twin Lakes Telephone has selected its FusionTV solution. Entone's FusionTV solution enables Twin Lakes Telephone to offer their subscribers a unified experience that combines the best of live HDTV, digital video recorder (DVR) and cloud services via a single TV user interface.

FusionTV is fully integrated with leading IPTV middleware and digital rights management (DRM) solutions. With a simple software update, Twin Lakes subscribers can instantly access and enjoy VUDU's streaming library of over 50,000 titles, as well as more than 50 popular cloud-based services such as photo sharing from Flickr and Picasa, and social media via Facebook and Twitter -- all without a truck roll.

"Our customers rely on us to provide them with personalized and reliable telecommunication services," said Jonathan West, General Manager and CEO of Twin Lakes Telephone Cooperative. "With Entone's FusionTV solution, we can leverage our existing network to offer the best of HDTV and online (OTT) services without the capital and operating costs associated with traditional pay-TV service. By offering OTT, not only can we monetize our broadband network, but we continue to strengthen our relationship with our customers."

Entone's FusionTV solution is a turn-key managed service platform that combines traditional pay-TV service with OTT services and is delivered as an operator-branded service. FusionTV allows service providers to roll out a unique video-centric broadband service that can increase the average revenue per user (ARPU) and strengthen subscriber satisfaction, all without the upfront capital investment and content acquisition complexities of proprietary VOD systems. FusionTV is enabled by Entone's 300 and 400 series of hybrid devices which integrates Broadcom's advanced dual-core processor -- providing a more flexible platform for supporting an array of video and hybrid TV applications.

Tuesday
Feb282012

Going Gigabit: Sonic Transitions from DSL to Fiber

California-based ISP Rolls out 1 Gbps Broadband at $70 per month, Eyes Video Service

It's an amusing ad campaign, for sure, but Bill and Carolyn Slowsky—the turtles who love DSL for its soothing slow speeds—hardly represent the majority of Americans. The truth is, DSL has become the punchline of many companies pushing faster Internet services, but while fiber is much faster, it's also expensive to deploy. Many ISPs of yore died trying to make the switch, and the death knell was the FCC's 2005 deregulation of DSL by classifying it as an “information service.” But Sonic.net is one of the few survivors—a company that has reinvented itself for a new era as a 1 Gbps broadband provider.

Based in Sonoma, California, and celebrating 18 years of business, Sonic has deployed FTTH in a swatch of its service area and is trying to recover costs by signing up whole neighborhoods for the new 1 Gbps connection. At just $69.95 per month, the offer is hard to resist.

In between the years of DSL and fiber, however, Sonic buoyed its business with ADSL2+. The transition in 2008 allowed Sonic to get more out of its DSL, so that it could compete with cable companies and offer service from 6 Mbps at $45 per month to 18 Mbps at $80 per month. By taking advantage of cheaper upstream connectivity, Sonic was then able to cut costs further and one year later the Internet provider offered its 18 Mbps service for just $55.

But ADSL2+ is limited in geographic scope. Sonic's service was only extensive in San Francisco, while covering only the downtown areas of Sebastopol and Santa Rosa. Beyond that, Sonic's customers could only connect via standard (and, for the most part, outmoded) DSL. Sonic wanted to go further.

Sonic co-founder and ceo Dane Jasper said the company had to make a conscious decision to reinvent itself. Fiber was the best option, and the only real solution to Sonic's DSL limits, which required the company to rely on the phone company's copper wire. Jasper told tech information site Ars Technica that Sonic's first rollout was in the dense neighborhood of Sebastopol. With about 7,400 residents living close together, Jasper said the plan was to connect as many subscribers as possible. To do so, Sonic offered an almost absurd deal: connectivity at 5x their current speed for the same price. Now customers who used to struggle through 3-6 Mbps DSL connections could enjoy blazing fast connections and not pay a penny more.

It was a bold move, Jasper acknowledged, but said, “The cost differential between a customer who's connected at all and one who's connected at one gigabit [per second] is nominal.” When Sonic moves a customer over from DSL, the company can recover the $12 per month it used to pay to the phone company to rent the copper line to that home. From that point forward, the company works to pay down the $500+ expense for that individual FTTH connection.

Analyst Benoit Felton told Ars Technica that, “on paper, the model is viable,” but noted the importance of Sonic signing up enough customers for the upgrade to make it sustainable. “If you get in the 40%-plus [range] it starts to look golden, and if you're in the 60% range,” he said, “you've built a cash printing machine.” Part of what makes Sonic's model work is its ability to string fiber as overhead lines, rather that burying it—a much more expensive prospect.

By the end of the year, Sonic will pass about 2,500 homes with fiber in Sebastopol, and 20k more in San Francisco's Sunset District. Jasper acknowledged that if the company expands further, it will have to go into debt to finance the growth. And it hopes to grow. Last year the company filed for a video franchise with California's PUC, hoping to soon run TV service to its subscribers as well.

So far, even on a national level, Sonic's $70 per month rate undercuts other providers—even Verizon and AT&T. Unconventional providers like Google are getting into the 1 Gbps fray, but the company hasn't yet announced its rates for the service beyond saying they will be a “competitive rate.” As far as smaller, local providers, there is one company on the other side of the country that will actually begin offering gigabit connections for a cheaper rate: Vermont Telephone (Vtel) says it will soon provide 1 Gbps broadband to 14 Vermont exchanges for a mere $30-35 per month. Vtel's blazing network is, of course, indebted to public funding. The Green Mountain ILEC received an $81m federal grant and $35m government-backed loan awarded to in 2010.

Sunday
Feb262012

Ben Lomand Telephone Highlights Potential of IPTV

Improvements to IPTV Service May Lead to Greater Adoption Among Telecom Providers

This past week Google garnered headlines when it filed applications in Kansas and Missouri to provide video services as part of its Kansas City fiber roll-out. The company said it would use “national and regional video headend facilities to send IPTV across a private (IP) network to subscribers.” In the week prior, McMinnville, Tennessee-based Ben Lomand Telephone Cooperative announced that it would expand and upgrade its IPTV service with Harmonic's ProStream 1000 platform. While the two are obviously unrelated, the pair of announcements seem to indicate a renewed faith in IPTV from the newest to the most traditional providers. Most importantly, for rural and independent telcos, IPTV could be a way for companies existing (or planned) broadband networks to compete with cable companies, retain customers, and attract new subscribers.

In the past year we've seen providers as diverse as CenturyLink, TDS Telecom, Palmetto Rural Telephone Cooperative, Paul Bunyan Communications, Etex Telephone Cooperative, and SRT Communications all herald the benefits of offering IPTV. And for one of those providers—TDS—the implementation of IPTV led to a tangible drop in churn and a gain of 30% market share against national cable providers in just three years. So it's no surprise that companies like Ben Lomand Tel are stepping up their video services in a rural area of Tennessee, where the cooperative could gain an edge on the cable cos.

Like so many cooperatives across the country, Ben Lomand began concentrating on fiber deployment years ago, and in 2005 connected some of its first neighborhoods with fiber optic capabilities. Since then, the company has been able to build off of its increasing fiber deployments—the main expense for offering IPTV. Now that the company is ready to upgrade its digital TV services, Ray Cantrell, chief technology officer for Ben Lomand, says that Harmonic's platform will actually cut down on capital and operating expenses for video services by reduced power consumption and rack space, while allowing the cooperative to meet growing demand. According to Harmonic's press release, the platform will ultimately provide Ben Lomand with “high-density, real-time transcoder to power HD and SD video for its 200-channel HD and SD IPTV service,” known as BLTV. Harmonic ProStream offers 18k channels worldwide. Cantrell said, “The ProStream 1000 with ACE delivers the video quality, functionality, and reliability to make it possible to expand our digital TV services successfully and cost-effectively, allowing us to bring high-quality, state-of-the-art IPTV services to rural areas.”

BLTV is already available in much of Ben Lomand's service area, including Warren County, and parts of White, Cumberland, Coffee, Van Buren, and Grundy Counties in Tennessee, and is expanding on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis. The company offers “all-digital, state-of-the-art service carried over our fiberoptic telephone lines,” including nine different premium packages, “InDemand” pay-per-view, and HD and DVR capabilities in some locations.

In years past, IPTV deployments were often hampered by poor Quality of Service—but because of better delivery systems, middleware, and software interfaces, telcos are now able to offer reliable service with all the bells and whistles, just like the cable giants.

Service and monitoring has improved, too. Companies like Smithville Communications, in Ellettsville, Indiana, credit their successful IPTV deployment to better network monitoring and reliable Quality of Service. Part of Smithville's success is due to something called “proactive service assurance”—advanced solutions in IPTV that allow telcos to monitor and detect problems with service all the way to the customer's home. Analyst Mark Savoie says that as technologies like this have improved, “This combination of better service consistency, faster resolution and reduced operational costs is a triple whammy” for telcos with IPTV. Often, says Savoie, network disturbances are detected and corrected before customers are even aware there was a problem. He goes on to say that “to consistently deliver high quality of experience... improve[s] their customer retention. With estimates that upwards of 65% of all customer churn is triggered by service quality issues, there is no question how crucial delivering superior customer experience is to the success and growth of rural telcos.”

On the customer experience side, some telcos we've seen are taking advantage of software platforms like Microsoft Mediaroom. These upgrades enable, as Chuck Crabtree of Palmetto Rural Telephone Company said, “a very slick, great interface” with services consumers have come to expect—like VOD, whole home DVR, and even remote DVR.

We're seeing more and more companies mention IPTV when they announce plans to build out a fiber network, too, such as West Kentucky and Tennessee Telecommunications Cooperative (WK&T), Ben Lomand's geographic neighbor. WK&T said this year that it is planning to incorporate IPTV into its FTTH build, thanks to a $123.8m Broadband Initiatives Program loan and grant package from the RUS. The fiber network will reach to all of WK&T's 21k homes and businesses in 22 exchanges of west Kentucky and northwest Tennessee. Upon completion next year, WK&T's network will line more than 2k miles of roadways with fiber, making it one of the largest Last Mile Broadband Stimulus grant awards, and the largest single award focused on wireline services.

Thursday
Feb162012

Cal-Ore Comm. Expands Wireless Broadband, Readies Voice Offering

Source: PureWave Networks Press Release

PureWave Networks announced that it has been selected by Cal-Ore Communications, Inc. as the company’s supplier of Mobile WiMAX (802.16e) infrastructure. With 16 base stations already deployed, the rapidly growing network currently covers approximately 200 square miles and a population of approximately 50,000 in rural California and Oregon, bringing broadband services to business and residents of rural communities.

In addition to advanced broadband service packages, offering aggregate speeds of up to 12Mbps, Cal-Ore also plans to offer phone services over the network and to expand the coverage area in the coming months.

Operating in the semi-licensed 3.65GHz band, Cal-Ore is using PureWave’s Quantum 6636 base stations to replace obsolete and much slower network equipment that operates in the 900MHz and 2.4GHz bands. “When we began to roll-out 3.65GHz equipment one of our main concerns was maximizing the coverage area,” said Charles Boening, Cal-Ore’s Network Manager. “After-all, the reason operators are still using old, slow equipment in the noisy 900MHz band is because of the band’s supposedly superior propagation characteristics. However, we were excited to discover that using PureWave’s gear we were able to achieve similar coverage in the 3.65GHz band as we were seeing with our legacy 900MHz equipment but deliver up to 5 times the capacity we were seeing with our legacy system.”

Based in Dorris, Calif., Cal-Ore Communications provides high speed Internet as well as traditional and IP based voice services in both Siskiyou and Klamath counties.